Novelty Assessment
Published by lingzhi227 in claude-research-skills
What this skill does
Assess research idea novelty through systematic literature search. Multi-round search-evaluate loops with harsh critic persona. Binary novel/not-novel decision with justification. Use before committing to a research direction.
Add Novelty Assessment to your agent
Review the source and files first. When you are ready, copy the prompt instruction or use the CLI command supported by your environment.
Install with a prompt
Paste this into a compatible coding agent:
add this skill "novelty-assessment" from https://github.com/lingzhi227/claude-research-skillsInstall with the CLI
Run this command in a controlled environment after reviewing the repository:
npx skills add https://github.com/lingzhi227/claude-research-skills --skill novelty-assessmentSkill instructions
Novelty Assessment
Rigorously assess whether a research idea is novel through systematic literature search.
Input
$0— Research idea description, title, or JSON file
Scripts
Automated novelty check
python ~/.claude/skills/idea-generation/scripts/novelty_check.py \
--idea "Your research idea description" \
--max-rounds 10 --output novelty_report.json
Literature search
python ~/.claude/skills/deep-research/scripts/search_semantic_scholar.py \
--query "relevant search query" --max-results 10
References
- Assessment prompts and criteria:
~/.claude/skills/novelty-assessment/references/assessment-prompts.md
Workflow
Step 1: Understand the Idea
- Identify the core contribution
- List the key technical components
- Determine the research area and subfield
Step 2: Multi-Round Literature Search (up to 10 rounds)
For each round:
- Generate a targeted search query
- Search Semantic Scholar / arXiv / OpenAlex
- Review top-10 results with abstracts
- Assess overlap with the idea
- Decide: need more searching, or ready to decide
Step 3: Make Decision
- Novel: After sufficient searching, no paper significantly overlaps
- Not Novel: Found a paper that significantly overlaps
Step 4: Position the Idea
If novel, identify:
- Most similar existing papers (for Related Work)
- How the idea differs from each
- The specific gap this idea fills
Harsh Critic Persona
Be a harsh critic for novelty. Ensure there is a sufficient contribution
for a new conference or workshop paper. A trivial extension of existing
work is NOT novel. The idea must offer a meaningfully different approach,
formulation, or insight.
Output Format
{
"decision": "novel" | "not_novel",
"confidence": "high" | "medium" | "low",
"justification": "After searching X rounds...",
"most_similar_papers": [
{"title": "...", "year": 2024, "overlap": "..."}
],
"differentiation": "Our idea differs because..."
}
Rules
- Minimum 3 search rounds before declaring novel
- Try to recall exact paper names for targeted queries
- A paper idea is NOT novel if it's a trivial extension
- Consider both methodology novelty AND application novelty
- Check for concurrent/recent arXiv submissions
Related Skills
- Upstream: literature-search, deep-research
- Downstream: idea-generation, research-planning
- See also: related-work-writing
Files included
- SKILL.md
- references/assessment-prompts.md
More skills
Novelty Assessment
lingzhi227/agent-research-skills
No summary provided.
Audit unavailable1.8k installsNovelty Assessment
tahaturkistanli-ctrl/agent-research-skills
No summary provided.
Audit unavailable1 installsNovelty Assessment
research-equality/re-research-design
No summary provided.
Audit unavailable1 installs

