Deep Research: Install, Source and Security | FunnelSlayer

Deep Research

Published by 199-biotechnologies in claude-deep-research-skill

Review recommended10k installs

What this skill does

Use when the user needs multi-source research with citation tracking, evidence persistence, and structured report generation. Triggers on "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", "analyze trends", or "state of the art". Not for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.

Add Deep Research to your agent

Review the source and files first. When you are ready, copy the prompt instruction or use the CLI command supported by your environment.

Install with a prompt

Paste this into a compatible coding agent:

add this skill "deep-research" from https://github.com/199-biotechnologies/claude-deep-research-skill

Install with the CLI

Run this command in a controlled environment after reviewing the repository:

npx skills add https://github.com/199-biotechnologies/claude-deep-research-skill --skill deep-research

Skill instructions

Deep Research

Core Purpose

Deliver citation-tracked research reports through a structured pipeline with evidence persistence, source identity management, claim-level verification, and progressive context management.

Autonomy Principle: Operate independently. Infer assumptions from context. Only stop for critical errors or incomprehensible queries. Surface high-materiality assumptions explicitly in the Introduction and Methodology rather than silently defaulting.


Decision Tree

Request Analysis
+-- Simple lookup? --> STOP: Use WebSearch
+-- Debugging? --> STOP: Use standard tools
+-- Complex analysis needed? --> CONTINUE

Mode Selection
+-- Initial exploration --> quick (3 phases, 2-5 min)
+-- Standard research --> standard (6 phases, 5-10 min) [DEFAULT]
+-- Critical decision --> deep (8 phases, 10-20 min)
+-- Comprehensive review --> ultradeep (8+ phases, 20-45 min)

Default assumptions: Technical query = technical audience. Comparison = balanced perspective. Trend = recent 1-2 years.


Workflow Overview

PhaseNameQuickStdDeepUltra
1SCOPEYYYY
2PLAN-YYY
3RETRIEVEYYYY
4TRIANGULATE-YYY
4.5OUTLINE REFINEMENT-YYY
5SYNTHESIZE-YYY
6CRITIQUE--YY
7REFINE--YY
8PACKAGEYYYY

Note: Phases 3-5 operate as an evidence loop per section (retrieve → evidence store → refine outline → draft → verify claims → delta-retrieve if needed), not as strict sequential gates.


Execution

On invocation, load relevant reference files:

  1. Phase 1-7: Load methodology.md for detailed phase instructions
  2. Phase 8 (Report): Load report-assembly.md for progressive generation
  3. HTML/PDF output: Load html-generation.md
  4. Quality checks: Load quality-gates.md
  5. Long reports (>18K words): Load continuation.md

Templates:

Scripts:

  • python scripts/validate_report.py --report [path]
  • python scripts/verify_citations.py --report [path]
  • python scripts/md_to_html.py [markdown_path]

Output Contract

Required sections:

  • Executive Summary (200-400 words)
  • Introduction (scope, methodology, assumptions)
  • Main Analysis (4-8 findings, 600-2,000 words each, cited)
  • Synthesis & Insights (patterns, implications)
  • Limitations & Caveats
  • Recommendations
  • Bibliography (COMPLETE - every citation, no placeholders)
  • Methodology Appendix

Output files (all to ~/Documents/[Topic]_Research_[YYYYMMDD]/):

  • Markdown (primary source of truth)
  • sources.jsonl — stable source registry with canonical IDs
  • evidence.jsonl — append-only evidence store with quotes and locators
  • claims.jsonl — atomic claim ledger with support status
  • run_manifest.json — query, mode, assumptions, provider config
  • HTML (McKinsey style, auto-opened)
  • PDF (professional print, auto-opened)

Quality standards:

  • 10+ sources, 3+ per major claim (cluster-independent, not just count)
  • All factual claims cited immediately [N] with evidence backing in evidence.jsonl
  • Claim-support verification mandatory: no unsupported factual claims pass delivery
  • No placeholders, no fabricated citations
  • Prose-first (>=80%), bullets sparingly

When to Use / NOT Use

Use: Comprehensive analysis, technology comparisons, state-of-the-art reviews, multi-perspective investigation, market analysis.

Do NOT use: Simple lookups, debugging, 1-2 search answers, quick time-sensitive queries.

Files included

  • SKILL.md
  • README.md
  • requirements.txt
  • reference/weasyprint_guidelines.md
  • .gitignore
  • schemas/claim.schema.json
  • reference/html-generation.md
  • reference/quality-gates.md
  • reference/continuation.md
  • reference/report-assembly.md
  • reference/methodology.md
  • schemas/evidence.schema.json
  • scripts/citation_manager.py
  • schemas/run_manifest.schema.json
  • scripts/extract_claims.py
  • scripts/evidence_store.py
  • schemas/source.schema.json
  • scripts/md_to_html.py
  • scripts/validate_report.py
  • scripts/source_evaluator.py
  • scripts/research_engine.py
  • scripts/verify_html.py
  • scripts/verify_claim_support.py
  • templates/report_template.md
  • templates/mckinsey_report_template.html
  • scripts/verify_citations.py
  • tests/fixtures/invalid_report.md
  • tests/test_evidence_store.py
  • tests/fixtures/valid_report.md
  • tests/test_citation_manager.py
  • tests/test_extract_claims.py
  • tests/test_verify_claim_support.py

More skills