Sales Hiring Brief: Install, Source and Security | FunnelSlayer

Sales Hiring Brief

Published by victor-shulga in gtm-strategy-skills

No known issues17 installs

What this skill does

>-

Add Sales Hiring Brief to your agent

Review the source and files first. When you are ready, copy the prompt instruction or use the CLI command supported by your environment.

Install with a prompt

Paste this into a compatible coding agent:

add this skill "sales-hiring-brief" from https://github.com/victor-shulga/gtm-strategy-skills

Install with the CLI

Run this command in a controlled environment after reviewing the repository:

npx skills add https://github.com/victor-shulga/gtm-strategy-skills --skill sales-hiring-brief

Skill instructions

Sales Hiring Brief

One package per role: brief → scorecard → interview kit → test task → 30/60/90. Built for service companies, where a bad sales hire costs a quarter, not a sprint.

Answer in the user's language. Table labels below are in English; translate them for the output if the team works in another language.

Rule zero: the role needs a job before it needs a person

Before writing anything, answer three questions. If any is unanswered, the hire is premature, and saying so is the finding:

  1. What number does this role move? A named metric, its current value, its target value.
  2. What exists for them to work with? A contact base, a playbook, an offer, a case library, or nothing? An SDR hired into an empty toolkit fails because of the company's gap, not their own.
  3. Who do they report to, and who reviews their work every week? No reviewer, no hire.

1. Role brief

BlockContent
Why this rolethe gap in one sentence, tied to a number
What it owns3-5 outcomes, each with its metric
What it does NOT doexplicit: this is where service-company roles go wrong; name the work that stays with someone else
First 90 daysone sentence describing success
Works withdaily, weekly, and who signs off
Market and pay rangethe range and the reasoning (level, market, remote or office)
Where we search2-3 channels, most specific first

Ranges must be real. A range inflated to look attractive brings candidates who leave in month two.

2. Scorecard: six weighted axes

Set the weights per role before seeing any candidate, never after. Score each axis 1-5, multiply by the weight, sum. One number per candidate, comparable across the whole funnel.

AxisWhat it reads
Relevant experiencehas done this exact job in a comparable context (B2B services differ from product and from retail)
Evidence of resultscan name their numbers and how they got them; separates the operator from the passenger
Self-directionbuilt something without a ready process, or only ran one
Language and communicationthe languages the role sells in, at the level it sells at
Learning speedpicks up a new domain quickly, which matters in technical niches (engineering, GIS, construction)
Culture fitdirect, peer-level, works without supervision

Default weights (percent), as a starting point to adjust:

RoleExperienceResultsSelf-directionLanguageLearningCulture
SDR152015251510
BDM / sales203015151010
Marketing manager152525101510

Change them when the role differs and write down why. Threshold: below 3.5 out of 5 weighted, no offer, however likeable the candidate.

Every score carries one line of evidence. A score without evidence is a feeling.

3. Interview kit

Two rounds. Round 1 screens for the operator, round 2 for fit with the actual work.

Round 1: evidence, 45 minutes. Structure each question as: past situation → what they did personally → where the number moved → what they would change. Ask for the number FIRST, then the method. People who inherited their results can describe the method but stall on the number.

Mandatory questions:

  • "Take a campaign you were personally responsible for. How many touches, how many replies, how many meetings?"
  • "What did not work in the last year, and why?" No answer means no reflection, and no reflection means slow growth.
  • "What did you do when the contact base was exhausted or the leads ran out?"
  • Role-specific: for an SDR, how they build a list; for a BDM, how they lose deals; for marketing, what they published and what it produced.

Round 2: the work, 45 minutes. Walk through the test task together. Probe the choices, not the output.

Red flags: results only in percentages with no absolute numbers; "the team did it" for every achievement; no failure they own; frameworks quoted with no example; needs the whole process handed to them.

4. Test task: paid, 2-3 hours, realistic

Never unpaid, never a week long, never the company's real backlog disguised as a test. One task per role, evaluated against a written key of 4-5 criteria that the candidate sees in advance.

RoleTaskWhat it reads
SDR / head of outboundbuild 20 accounts for a given ICP, name the buying signal for each, write one first-touch messagedata sourcing, signal thinking, writing
BDM / saleslisten to a recorded discovery call (or read a transcript): qualification verdict, next step, what was missedqualification, judgement
Marketing managerteardown of the company's own page plus 3 concrete changes with reasonsdiagnosis over decoration
Account managergiven an account's facts: health read, renewal risk, next actionsense for risk

Default evaluation key: reasoning quality 40, data accuracy 25, writing 20, on time and in format 15.

5. Onboarding: 30/60/90

WindowGoalDone when
Days 0-30context loadedknows the ICP, the offers and the proof library; can explain what the company sells and to whom without help; has shadowed real work
Days 31-60supervised outputruns the motion with every artifact reviewed; first own numbers on the board
Days 61-90independentowns the metric from the brief; work reviewed weekly, not item by item

Each window needs a named reviewer, a weekly checkpoint, and a written go / no-go decision at day 90. A no-go at day 90 is a cheap decision; at day 180 it is an expensive one.

List what the hire needs on day 1: playbook, ICP document, case library, tool access. If these do not exist, building them is a prerequisite of the hire, not the hire's first task.


Process

  1. Answer rule zero. If it fails, say so and stop: that is the finding.
  2. Write the brief. Confirm the pay range and the search channels with the user.
  3. Set the weights, then build the scorecard template.
  4. Assemble the interview kit and the test task with its key.
  5. Build the 30/60/90 with named reviewers.
  6. Edit the prose for AI tells; if installed, use anticopywriting-ai (pack gtm-skills).
  7. Ship the package:
    • as a Notion page, if a Notion connector is available;
    • otherwise as a markdown document (or .docx via the docx skill, if the user prefers).
  8. When CVs arrive, score them on the same card and output a ranked table with evidence per axis.

Keep the package generic enough to reuse: no candidate personal data in shared templates, and no names of other companies' employees in examples.

Related skills (optional, if installed)

  • capacity-plan (pack gtm-strategy-skills): confirms the team actually needs another person.
  • revenue-forecast-writer (pack gtm-strategy-skills): the forecast that shows which hire closes the gap.
  • icp-builder (pack outbound-engine-skills): the ICP document the SDR test task is built on.

Credits

Built by Victor Shulga for B2B service companies.

Files included

  • SKILL.md

More skills