Sales Hiring Brief
Published by victor-shulga in gtm-strategy-skills
What this skill does
>-
Add Sales Hiring Brief to your agent
Review the source and files first. When you are ready, copy the prompt instruction or use the CLI command supported by your environment.
Install with a prompt
Paste this into a compatible coding agent:
add this skill "sales-hiring-brief" from https://github.com/victor-shulga/gtm-strategy-skillsInstall with the CLI
Run this command in a controlled environment after reviewing the repository:
npx skills add https://github.com/victor-shulga/gtm-strategy-skills --skill sales-hiring-briefSkill instructions
Sales Hiring Brief
One package per role: brief → scorecard → interview kit → test task → 30/60/90. Built for service companies, where a bad sales hire costs a quarter, not a sprint.
Answer in the user's language. Table labels below are in English; translate them for the output if the team works in another language.
Rule zero: the role needs a job before it needs a person
Before writing anything, answer three questions. If any is unanswered, the hire is premature, and saying so is the finding:
- What number does this role move? A named metric, its current value, its target value.
- What exists for them to work with? A contact base, a playbook, an offer, a case library, or nothing? An SDR hired into an empty toolkit fails because of the company's gap, not their own.
- Who do they report to, and who reviews their work every week? No reviewer, no hire.
1. Role brief
| Block | Content |
|---|---|
| Why this role | the gap in one sentence, tied to a number |
| What it owns | 3-5 outcomes, each with its metric |
| What it does NOT do | explicit: this is where service-company roles go wrong; name the work that stays with someone else |
| First 90 days | one sentence describing success |
| Works with | daily, weekly, and who signs off |
| Market and pay range | the range and the reasoning (level, market, remote or office) |
| Where we search | 2-3 channels, most specific first |
Ranges must be real. A range inflated to look attractive brings candidates who leave in month two.
2. Scorecard: six weighted axes
Set the weights per role before seeing any candidate, never after. Score each axis 1-5, multiply by the weight, sum. One number per candidate, comparable across the whole funnel.
| Axis | What it reads |
|---|---|
| Relevant experience | has done this exact job in a comparable context (B2B services differ from product and from retail) |
| Evidence of results | can name their numbers and how they got them; separates the operator from the passenger |
| Self-direction | built something without a ready process, or only ran one |
| Language and communication | the languages the role sells in, at the level it sells at |
| Learning speed | picks up a new domain quickly, which matters in technical niches (engineering, GIS, construction) |
| Culture fit | direct, peer-level, works without supervision |
Default weights (percent), as a starting point to adjust:
| Role | Experience | Results | Self-direction | Language | Learning | Culture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDR | 15 | 20 | 15 | 25 | 15 | 10 |
| BDM / sales | 20 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 10 |
| Marketing manager | 15 | 25 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 10 |
Change them when the role differs and write down why. Threshold: below 3.5 out of 5 weighted, no offer, however likeable the candidate.
Every score carries one line of evidence. A score without evidence is a feeling.
3. Interview kit
Two rounds. Round 1 screens for the operator, round 2 for fit with the actual work.
Round 1: evidence, 45 minutes. Structure each question as: past situation → what they did personally → where the number moved → what they would change. Ask for the number FIRST, then the method. People who inherited their results can describe the method but stall on the number.
Mandatory questions:
- "Take a campaign you were personally responsible for. How many touches, how many replies, how many meetings?"
- "What did not work in the last year, and why?" No answer means no reflection, and no reflection means slow growth.
- "What did you do when the contact base was exhausted or the leads ran out?"
- Role-specific: for an SDR, how they build a list; for a BDM, how they lose deals; for marketing, what they published and what it produced.
Round 2: the work, 45 minutes. Walk through the test task together. Probe the choices, not the output.
Red flags: results only in percentages with no absolute numbers; "the team did it" for every achievement; no failure they own; frameworks quoted with no example; needs the whole process handed to them.
4. Test task: paid, 2-3 hours, realistic
Never unpaid, never a week long, never the company's real backlog disguised as a test. One task per role, evaluated against a written key of 4-5 criteria that the candidate sees in advance.
| Role | Task | What it reads |
|---|---|---|
| SDR / head of outbound | build 20 accounts for a given ICP, name the buying signal for each, write one first-touch message | data sourcing, signal thinking, writing |
| BDM / sales | listen to a recorded discovery call (or read a transcript): qualification verdict, next step, what was missed | qualification, judgement |
| Marketing manager | teardown of the company's own page plus 3 concrete changes with reasons | diagnosis over decoration |
| Account manager | given an account's facts: health read, renewal risk, next action | sense for risk |
Default evaluation key: reasoning quality 40, data accuracy 25, writing 20, on time and in format 15.
5. Onboarding: 30/60/90
| Window | Goal | Done when |
|---|---|---|
| Days 0-30 | context loaded | knows the ICP, the offers and the proof library; can explain what the company sells and to whom without help; has shadowed real work |
| Days 31-60 | supervised output | runs the motion with every artifact reviewed; first own numbers on the board |
| Days 61-90 | independent | owns the metric from the brief; work reviewed weekly, not item by item |
Each window needs a named reviewer, a weekly checkpoint, and a written go / no-go decision at day 90. A no-go at day 90 is a cheap decision; at day 180 it is an expensive one.
List what the hire needs on day 1: playbook, ICP document, case library, tool access. If these do not exist, building them is a prerequisite of the hire, not the hire's first task.
Process
- Answer rule zero. If it fails, say so and stop: that is the finding.
- Write the brief. Confirm the pay range and the search channels with the user.
- Set the weights, then build the scorecard template.
- Assemble the interview kit and the test task with its key.
- Build the 30/60/90 with named reviewers.
- Edit the prose for AI tells; if installed, use
anticopywriting-ai(packgtm-skills). - Ship the package:
- as a Notion page, if a Notion connector is available;
- otherwise as a markdown document (or .docx via the docx skill, if the user prefers).
- When CVs arrive, score them on the same card and output a ranked table with evidence per axis.
Keep the package generic enough to reuse: no candidate personal data in shared templates, and no names of other companies' employees in examples.
Related skills (optional, if installed)
capacity-plan(packgtm-strategy-skills): confirms the team actually needs another person.revenue-forecast-writer(packgtm-strategy-skills): the forecast that shows which hire closes the gap.icp-builder(packoutbound-engine-skills): the ICP document the SDR test task is built on.
Credits
Built by Victor Shulga for B2B service companies.
Files included
- SKILL.md

